|
''The Myth of God Incarnate'' is a book edited by John Hick and published by SCM Press in 1977. James Dunn, in a 1980 literature review of academic work on the incarnation, noted the "well-publicized symposium entitled ''The Myth of God Incarnate'', including contributions on the NT from M. Goulder and F. Young, which provoked several responses".〔Dunn (1980): 3.〕 Two years later, in another literature review, R. T. France commented that "theology dropped out of the headlines again, until in 1977 the title, if not the contents, of ''The Myth of God Incarnate'' revived public interest".〔France (1981): 19.〕 In the 21st century, ''The Daily Telegraph'' 2005 obituary for contributor Maurice Wiles (father of Andrew Wiles) described the book as "a highly controversial volume of essays".〔 "(The Rev Professor Maurice Wiles )", ''The Daily Telegraph'', 7 June 2005.〕 The controversy prompted a sequel, ''Incarnation and Myth: the Debate Continued'' (1979), edited by Michael Goulder, another contributor to the original volume. In the preface to the book, the contributors start by describing their "clear" perception that Christianity has always been a changing and diverse "movement",〔Hick (1977): ix.〕 quoting T. S. Eliot—"Christianity is always adapting itself into something which can be believed". They also explain that they are "convinced" that growing knowledge of Christian origins leads to accepting that Jesus was ... 'a man approved by God' for a special role within the divine purpose", but that later Christian conceptions of him "as God incarnate, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity" were a "mythological or poetic way of expressing his significance for us."〔 The contributors also mention that: "we have met together for discussion five times during the last three years, and we now offer the results in the hope that they will stimulate a wider discussion both inside and outside the churches."〔 == Overview == The contributors to Hick's collection of essays divided their work into two sections: the first examining "Christian sources"; and the second examining "the development of doctrine".〔Hick (1977): xi.〕 In the preface, however, they note that this division is "not absolute", since sources and contemporary issues are related and discussion of either requires reference to the other.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「The Myth of God Incarnate」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|